House Committee weighs Marsy’s Law testimony

Gov. Chris Sununu seated with Bob Marriott during a hearing Tuesday on Marsy’s Law. Marriott’s daughter, Lizzi, was murdered in 2012. Photo/Laura Aronson

CONCORD, NH โ€“ Gov. Chris Sununu testified Tuesday in favor of “Marsy’s Lawโ€, CACR 22,ย a proposed constitutional amendment for victimsโ€™ rights,ย at aย joint hearing of theย House Judiciary and House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committees.

Appearing alongside Bob Marriott, whose daughter was murdered in 2012,ย Sununuย passionately insisted New Hampshire “must do better” to place the rights of crime victims on an equal legal footing with those accused or convicted of committing. Responding to a question about potential costs, he insisted that costs should be no barrier.

State Sen. Donna Soucy of Manchester was in attendance at the hearing. She did not respond to a request for her comment.ย The bill was sponsored by 23 of 24 state senators, including Manchester Senators Soucy (D-18), Kevin Cavanaugh (D-16), and Lou Dโ€™Allesandro (D-20).

Manchester State Sen. Donna Soucy attended the Marsy’s Law hearing during the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee. Photo/Laura Aronson

Opponents say it is unnecessary to make detailed changes to the constitution and assert that the existingย Victim Bill of Rightsย (RSA 21-M:8-k)ย is adequate.ย Jeanne Hruska, Policy Director of theย ACLU of NHย said, โ€œTheย statute has strong rights, and provides correct guidance. It protects victimsโ€™ rights to the extent that they donโ€™t conflict with defendantโ€™s rights, which rarely occurs. A constitutional right can no more be enforced than a statute.โ€

Amanda Grady Sexton, director of theย New Hampshire organizationย for Marsyโ€™s Law, said, โ€œThe current statute doesnโ€™t have the weight of a constitutional protection of rights. We must elevate them so courts can weigh them equally with rights of the accused and convicted. The courts donโ€™t have the tools to do the balancing acts that are necessary.โ€ As an example, she said, โ€œIf a parole board fails to notify a victim that a criminal is up for parole, under the constitutional amendment, the parole board would have to hear the victimโ€™s petition.โ€

Hruska asked, โ€œIf there is a problem with victimsโ€™ rights not being enforced, is that a problem of law or of resources? If it is a matter of resources, the constitutional amendment does not produce more resources.โ€

Sexton said, โ€œNew Hampshire does an extraordinary job in enforcing those rights.โ€ She said she does not have any numbers for the scope of the problem, adding, โ€œThe problems are not with the case outcomes, but with how the victims were treated.โ€


Sign up for the FREE daily newsletter and never miss another thing!

Subscribe

* indicates required

Support Ink Link